Editorial standards & verification methodology
Students and parents make life-changing decisions based on what we publish. This page is the public commitment we make on how every listing and article gets onto the site, how often we re-check it, and what happens when we get something wrong.
1. Where listings come from
Every scholarship in our catalogue is sourced from one of three places: (a) the official funder — government ministries, embassies, foundations, and university financial-aid offices; (b) accredited intergovernmental partners (e.g. DAAD, British Council, Campus France, Nuffic); and (c) verified press releases from those same organisations. We do not republish listings from third-party scholarship aggregators without going back to the official source.
2. How we verify deadlines and links
For every listing we record an official URL, a verified deadline and the timestamp of the most recent check. Our verifier re-fetches the official page on a rolling cycle. If the page returns 404, redirects to a homepage, or no longer mentions the programme, we flag the listing as dead-link and surface that status on the listing card and detail page. Live verification progress is published at /verification.
Listings without a confirmed official URL are not counted in our verified total. We never make up a deadline; if the funder has not announced the next cycle, we say so on the listing.
3. Update cadence
New scholarships and edits are published continuously. Major destination, country and category landing pages are reviewed at least once per quarter against the live catalogue. Blog posts carry a last reviewed date and are revisited at least annually, and immediately when an underlying programme changes (deadline shift, eligibility change, funder rebrand).
4. Editorial independence
Listings are never paid placements. Funders cannot pay to be featured, ranked higher, or removed. We do not accept gifts or trips from funders or universities in exchange for coverage. When we link to a partner programme that compensates the site (currently: none), we will disclose it inline on the article and in this section.
6. Use of AI
We use AI tools to draft summaries, translate funder pages, and surface candidate listings. Every published listing is reviewed by a human editor before going live. AI is never the final authority on a deadline, an eligibility rule, or a funding amount.
7. Corrections policy
If you find a wrong deadline, a broken link, an outdated eligibility rule, or anything else that misled you, please report it via /corrections. We aim to acknowledge corrections within 48 hours and post a visible correction note on the affected page when we update it.
8. Get in touch
For press, partnerships, takedown requests, or anything not covered above, see /contact.
